Cognitive Engineering

Friday, 1 May 2020

Podcast: Apocalypse Yet?

How would we know if the world was ending? 
Things mentioned in this podcast:

  • Ministerial reassurance over food supplies?
  • A Journey to the End of Time
  • Fifteen Signs before Doomsday
  • Timelapse of the Future

Cognitive Engineering · Apocalypse Yet?


Find more Cognitive Engineering episodes here https://link.chtbl.com/SQeIgc44
Posted by petecog at 14:42
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: panic, rationality, toilet rolls

No comments:

Post a comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Aleph Insights Home

Aleph Insights Home

Search This Blog

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2020 (40)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ▼  May (5)
      • Podcast: Mob mentality
      • Power shifts
      • Podcast: Cultures of Debate
      • Podcast: What makes a good excuse?
      • Podcast: Apocalypse Yet?
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2019 (44)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2018 (51)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2017 (50)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2016 (55)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (10)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2015 (26)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (7)
  • ►  2014 (38)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (12)
    • ►  October (20)

Blogroll

  • Futility Closet
  • FlowingData
  • Error Statistics Philosophy
  • Overcoming Bias
  • Gwern
  • Overthinking It
  • The Aperiodical
  • ribbonfarm
  • Sources And Methods
  • Slate Star Codex
  • Andart II
  • Rationally Speaking
  • matthen
  • Finding Patterns - Journal

Tweet this post

Tweet

Find our podcast on...

Listen on Google Play Music

Follow by Email

Labels

probability (21) decision-making (17) uncertainty (12) confidence (11) information (11) perception (11) risk (10) narrative scenario (9) Trump (8) forecast (8) podcast (8) prediction (8) artificial intelligence (7) probabilistic judgement (7) technology (7) Bayes Theorem (6) bias (6) communication (6) decisionmaking (6) signalling (6) terrorism (6) analysis (5) data (5) history (5) irrationality (5) language (5) machine learning (5) AI (4) base rate (4) behavior change (4) belief (4) economics (4) evidence (4) games (4) good judgement project (4) hypothesis generation (4) learning (4) optimal decision (4) politics (4) UI (3) UX (3) accountability (3) ambiguity (3) automation (3) brexit (3) coincidence (3) culture (3) decision (3) error (3) evidence of absence (3) general election 2017 (3) hypothesis (3) hypothesis-based reasoning (3) impact (3) luck (3) memory (3) music (3) ownership (3) rare events (3) rationality (3) referendum (3) statistics (3) strategy (3) Facebook (2) Global Terrorism Database (2) Jorge Luis Borges (2) Library of Babel (2) Star Wars (2) absence of evidence (2) accidents (2) advice (2) algorithm (2) bats (2) big data (2) categorisation (2) chance (2) classification (2) computer interface (2) coronavirus (2) cost of information (2) creativity (2) deception (2) democracy (2) elections (2) emotion (2) evolution (2) failure of imagination (2) fake news (2) hubris (2) ideas (2) influence (2) information-gathering (2) language of probability (2) meaning (2) messaging (2) money (2) odds (2) organisational arationality (2) panic (2) parasitism (2) political regime (2) resilience (2) sampling (2) scenario generation (2) science (2) signalling cost (2) space (2) threat level (2) uncertainty yardstick (2) unpredictability (2) value of information (2) warning (2) weather (2) wild card (2) Akerlof (1) AlphaGo (1) Averages (1) BMI (1) Butler report (1) Chilcot (1) Cosmopolitanism (1) Cruftsgate (1) Cuban missile crisis (1) Deep Q (1) Derek Parfit (1) EU (1) Education (1) Egypt (1) FOAF (1) Feynman (1) Hillsborough disaster (1) IP (1) Ishikawa (1) JTAC (1) Kahneman (1) L'Aquila quake (1) Leicester City (1) MEAI (1) McKinsey (1) Meme (1) Monte Carlo (1) Nassim Taleb (1) Olympics (1) Pherson (1) RAND (1) SWOT (1) Security Service (1) Sharm el-Sheikh (1) Solomonoff induction (1) Sony Interview Film hack (1) Sorites paradox (1) The Third Policeman (1) Thomas Schelling (1) Tversky (1) UK Terror Threat Level (1) Virtual Reality (1) WOPR (1) ad blocking (1) adversarial (1) age (1) alpha zero (1) analysis of competing hypotheses (1) anchoring (1) animals (1) anxiety worry cognitiveeconomics decisionmaking (1) argument map (1) arguments (1) asymmetric belief impact (1) atmospheric (1) backwards induction (1) base rate neglect (1) behaviour (1) behaviour change (1) binary test (1) binarythinking (1) black swan (1) body of evidence (1) brainstorm (1) business (1) capturing judgement (1) cause-effect (1) celebrity (1) censorship (1) chaos (1) chaos prediction horizon (1) charity (1) cheating (1) class (1) climate (1) closed question (1) cognition (1) cognitive dissonance (1) color (1) colour (1) competition (1) complexsystems (1) computing (1) conditional probability (1) confidence intervals (1) conjunction fallacy (1) consequences (1) consequentialism (1) conservatism (1) constraints (1) context (1) control systems (1) conventions (1) convergent (1) copyright (1) correlation (1) cost (1) critical probability (1) cults (1) currency (1) data length (1) data science (1) data width (1) dataanalysis (1) datamodelling (1) denialism (1) density (1) descriptive statistics (1) detection (1) development (1) digital (1) disease (1) disease; blame; vaccination; (1) divergent (1) dr nim (1) driving (1) dust (1) ebola (1) endorsements (1) endowment effect (1) environment (1) equilibrium (1) estimation (1) ethics (1) excess (1) excuses (1) expectation (1) experts (1) extinction rebellion (1) extremism (1) failure (1) fakenews (1) false negative (1) false positive (1) fear (1) feedback (1) fertility population economy society productivity (1) films (1) flat earth (1) fragility (1) frequentism (1) frequentisum (1) fruit (1) futurism (1) game theory (1) gamification (1) generalisation (1) gjp (1) gradual change (1) groundhog day (1) group (1) grumpy old men (1) guidance (1) hamburgers (1) health (1) herd (1) heuristics (1) hindsight bias (1) hofstadter's law (1) horizon scanning (1) hot tubs (1) hypothesis testing (1) identify objectives (1) identify outcomes (1) identify resources (1) ignorance (1) immutability (1) indicator (1) inequality (1) inference (1) innovation (1) intolerance (1) intuition (1) investment (1) irony (1) judgement (1) lane changing (1) legal code of analysis (1) liberalism (1) likelihood (1) long term (1) loss aversion (1) magic (1) mandela effect (1) marginal gains (1) marketing (1) mean (1) measurement (1) medical (1) metaphysics (1) method (1) methods (1) metrics (1) mimas (1) mistakes (1) modelling (1) moderation (1) morality (1) mould (1) mysteries (1) national security risk assessment (1) natural disasters (1) norms (1) nostalgia (1) novelty (1) numerical simulation (1) obesity (1) onehitwonder (1) open question (1) opinions (1) outcomes (1) outgroup (1) overconfidence (1) paradox (1) pareto principle (1) perceptions (1) performance (1) piety (1) planning (1) polarisation (1) political capital (1) polling (1) popular (1) popularity (1) postdigital (1) prayer (1) predigital (1) prisoners dilemma (1) privacy (1) procrastination (1) product fails (1) productivity (1) prohibition (1) prometheus (1) propositional scenario (1) provenience (1) pseudo science (1) psychology (1) quality (1) quick wins for busy analysts (1) race (1) ransomware (1) realism (1) redaction (1) requirements (1) restraint (1) retrofuturism (1) reward (1) risk assessment (1) running away (1) sand (1) screening (1) search strategies (1) secrets (1) security (1) sentience (1) serendipity (1) shibboleth (1) short term (1) signalling games (1) skill (1) smell (1) smoking gun (1) smta (1) socialstanding (1) space ship (1) spacedust (1) specialisation (1) sport (1) st petersburg paradox (1) steady state (1) streaming (1) success (1) sunspring (1) surveillance (1) symmetric belief impact (1) taphonomy (1) tech (1) tech fail (1) technological determinism (1) technology fails (1) tetlock (1) time (1) time frame (1) toilet rolls (1) torino scale (1) tradition (1) trolley problem (1) tunnel vision (1) tv tropes (1) tylervigen.com (1) type I (1) type II (1) universality (1) urns (1) utility function (1) vagueness (1) value (1) visualisation (1) wannacry (1) war (1) war games (1) wave of death (1) waybackmachine (1) wellbeing (1) winging it (1) words (1)
Copyright Aleph Insights Limited, 2016. Powered by Blogger.